It is currently an excellent time to consider a career in neurology and stroke medicine.
The specialty is extremely varied and a growth area due breakthrough advances in research and the increasing demand for neurologists both acutely (liaison neurology, acute stroke) and in the management of chronic neurological disorders.
Neurology - trainee characteristics
Neurology is a broad specialty in which trainees will work independently and within an MDT to see patients with acute and chronic problems. It will suit trainees who:
- are good communicators and have good clinical skills
- are problem solvers with an interest in clinically relevant neuroscience
- are team players but able to work with a measure of independence
Training in Neurology and Stroke Medicine
Neurology and Stroke Medicine have changed dramatically in the last few years. Advances in neuroimaging, molecular biology and the emergence of effective therapies has improved the management of many conditions including stroke, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease. Ground-breaking treatments are transforming neurological outcomes, for example gene-specific targeted therapies in previously untreatable genetic neurological disorders, and mechanical thrombectomy for patients with large-vessel ischaemic stroke.
Training
The Neurology Curriculum (2022) incorporates the subspecialty of Stroke Medicine and all trainees will also dual-accredit in Internal Medicine over an indicative period of five years. Training will take place in a variety of sites including regional neuroscience centres and other neurology units, including district general hospitals. Training, education and assessment are delivered by local deaneries following the GMC-approved curriculum developed by the Specialist Advisory Committee in conjunction with all stakeholders, including the Education Committee of the Association of British Neurologists, and the Association of British Neurologists Trainees committee.
Research opportunities
There are plenty of opportunities for research in neurology, and many trainees undertake a period of research to obtain an MD or PhD as part of their neurological training (as an out-of-programme activity).
Neurology in demand
Over the last few years, there has been an increase in the number of consultant neurologists and it is likely that new posts will continue to be developed, such is the demand for specialist neurological care. Most district general hospitals will require several neurologists in order to deal with GP referrals, inpatient referrals and ward care.
Furthermore, the NHS England Long Term Plan National Stroke Programme has increased the need for specialists, including neurologists, with an expertise in the care of patients with cerebrovascular disease. All neurologists who train according to the Neurology Curriculum (2022) will be eligible to apply for posts which involve stroke medicine or delivering the acute medical take.
Further information
JRCPTB specialty page and curriculum
Neurology Person specification
General / application queries
For general queries relating to areas such as eligibility criteria, making an application or the Oriel system, please contact the Physician Specialty Recruitment Office.
Queries regarding the progress of a submitted application should be directed to the lead recruiter for this specialty. The lead recruiter for neurology is Thames Valley.
NHS England Thames Valley | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
email address | [email protected] | |||||
website | https://thamesvalley.hee.nhs.uk/medicine/ |
Group 1 specialty
This is a Group 1 specialty and requires completion of the internal medicine training (IMT) stage 1 programme or equivalent; all programmes in the specialty will dual specialise with general internal medicine.
Therefore, this specialty uses the standard HST eligibility criteria for Group 1 specialties and does not accept candidates from any alternative training routes. Please visit the am I eligible? section of this website for further information.
Commitment to specialty
The specialty will not be assessing your commitment to specialty as part of the shortlisting process and will score your application purely via the self-assessment scoring framework. Commitment to specialty will be assessed as part of the interview.
Expected to participate in round 2
This specialty has traditionally particpated in the second round. Although it cannot be guaranteed until the first round is completed, it is very likely that there will be a second round for this specialty this recruitment year. Participation in the second round is confirmed in June each year.
As part of the process of applying to HST, you may wish to gain an idea of how recruitment progressed in previous years for the various specialties participating in the nationally-coordinated recruitment.
To this end, we have published data dating back to 2013 (where this is available), based around four main areas:
-
Competition ratios - application numbers submitted to each specialty, along with the number of NTN and LAT posts available in each. It is worth noting that posts are subject to change throughout the round (increasing on average between 20-40%), and post numbers for this data are taken at the end of the round.
-
Shortlist scores - the scores awarded to all submitted applications, including average scores and distribution nationally.
-
Total scores - the total score awarded to all candidates who completed the full recruitment process for a specialty (application and interview), including some analysis of scores.
-
Post fill rates - the number of posts filled by region.
We have published information for all specialties participating in our process that year; consequently not all specialties will have data in all cases.
Round 1
Year | Apps. | NTN posts | LAT posts | Total posts | Comp. | Unique* |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2024 | 189 | 70 | 0 | 70 | 2.7 | TBC |
2023 | 147 | 61 | 1 | 62 | 2.4 | 35% |
2022 | 117 | 71 | 0 | 71 | 1.6 | 30% |
2021 | 168 | 50 | 0 | 50 | 3.4 | N/A** |
2020 | 188 | 46 | 3 | 49 | 3.8 | 59% |
2019 | 129 | 44 | 4 | 48 | 2.7 | 61% |
2018 | 128 | 46 | 3 | 49 | 2.6 | 49% |
2017 | 115 | 42 | 3 | 45 | 2.6 | 65% |
2016 | 131 | 42 | 4 | 46 | 3.7 | 62% |
2015 | 98 | 34 | 12 | 46 | 2.1 | 67% |
* the percentage of unique candidates that only applied to this specialty (out of the PSRO-coordinated specialties)
** As many specialties did not participate in recruitment in 2021, the data is not comparable.
Round 2
Year | Apps. | NTN posts | LAT posts | Total posts | Comp. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 | 72 | 19 | 1 | 20 | 3.6 |
2022 | 50 | 23 | 0 | 23 | 2.2 |
2021 | This specialty did not participate in r2 | ||||
2020 | 132 | 21 | 1 | 22 | 6 |
2019 | 50 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 7.1 |
2018 | 43 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 4.3 |
2017 | 39 | 16 | 3 | 19 | 2.1 |
2016 | 42 | 13 | 3 | 16 | 2.6 |
2015 | 30 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 1.5 |
Indicative post numbers
Indicative vacancy numbers are available in the table below, broken down by region and divided between substantive national training number (NTN) and locum appointment for training (LAT) posts. In many cases these will be presented as a range (e.g. 1-4) as it is not always possible for regions to know at this stage how many vacancies there will be.
It is the intention that indicative post numbers for all regions will be published prior to the application opening date, although this cannot be guaranteed. Please note that this table is not likely to be updated subsequent to indicative numbers and actual numbers will be confirmed when programme preferences are opened later in the round.
Numbers subject to change
Please be aware that it is not uncommon for vacancy numbers to change as the round progresses.
More commonly, post vacancy numbers can increase as the round goes on (and confirmation of posts becomes available); but it is also possible that numbers can reduce as well. In the past, post numbers have risen an average of 20-40% from the start to the finish of the round but this can vary greatly for individual specialty/region combinations.
It is possible that regions which do not have a post at the start of the round may declare one after applications have closed. Whilst we try and minimise instances of this, it is not always possible to predict vacancies so even if there appears not to be a vacancy in your preferred specialty/region combination, you may wish to consider applying in case one becomes available during the round; you can check with the region concerned if you wish to check on the likelihood of a post arising.
Generally, once a region enter a post into a round they would always have at least one post available and would only withdraw it in exceptional circumstances.
Round 1 Interview dates & posts
Region | NTN posts | LAT posts* | Evidence upload date(s) | Interview date(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
East of England | TBC | N/A |
6 - 15 January 2025 |
18, 19 March 2025 |
East Midlands | 0 | N/A | ||
London |
TBC |
N/A | ||
Kent, Surrey and Sussex |
TBC |
N/A | ||
North East | 0 - 2 | N/A | ||
North West |
Mersey TBC |
N/A | ||
North Western TBC |
N/A | |||
South West |
Peninsula 0 - 2 |
N/A | ||
Severn 0 - 1 |
N/A | |||
Thames Valley | 0 - 1 | N/A | ||
Wessex | 2 - 4 | N/A | ||
West Midlands | 0 - 1 | N/A | ||
Yorkshire & Humber | 5 - 7 | N/A | ||
Scotland** | 5 - 9 | TBC | ||
Wales | 1 - 2 | TBC | ||
Northern Ireland | 0 - 2 | TBC |
*English LATs
Please note, English regions do not recruit to LAT posts.
**Scotland post numbers
If you are interested in working in Scotland, a breakdown of post numbers by the four Scottish regions is available on the Scottish Medical Training website. This has details of all specialty training post numbers in Scotland, including specialties which are not part of the nationally-coordinated process.
The SMT website will always be the more accurate one where they differ.
Interview content
The interview be split across two separate stations with a separate pair of interviewers scoring you on the areas within their station. There will be four questions 7.5 minutes in length. You will be marked on these questions with five scored areas in total; one question generating two separate marks. The headings below show the question areas and in which station they will be covered, along with information about what will be assessed.
Each station will last 15 minutes, so including the time between stations, the interview will be approximately 35 - 40 minutes.
Please note that this is subject to change and will be confirmed by the date of interview.
This question will see you scored on two areas via a combined question which covers both elements:
- Application form and training to date - questions based on your career, achievements to date and your engagement with training and learning
- Suitability and commitment - looking at your suitability and commitment to training in the specialty, giving you opportunity to expand on the information provided in your application form
It is important to recognise that the application form and training scores awarded to you will not purely be about your achievements, as this already contributes towards the scoring via your application form. Interviewers will be deciding upon scores via a combination of factors, for example: your responses to the questions asked, the breadth and quality of your achievements and your career progression.
This question will take approximately 7.5 minutes.
You will need to give a presentation on the following topic, for no more than three minutes:
'An interesting case I have been involved in/a case that has changed my practice'
When preparing your presentation, please bear in mind the points below:
- Clarity & relevance most important - Select a topic that is relevant to neurology, and which you can present with clarity. This is more important than trying to impress by choosing a subject that is esoteric or complex. It should be relevant to your application where possible.
- Three-minute time limit - Your presentation must last for no more than three minutes. Bear in mind that interviewers will be assessing the level, depth and content of your presentation, as well as expecting some structure.
-
No aids/resources allowed – you are not allowed to use any visual representations, such as PowerPoint, when giving your presentation and you must not share your screen. You are welcome to use prompts on small cards, but these should be for your own use only.
Post-presentation discussion
Once your presentation is finished (interviewers will stop you at the three minute-mark), interviewers will discuss it with you and ask further questions relating to the items you raise and any further points.
This discussion will take place for approximately four and a half minutes.
This question will explore the non-clinical aspects of being a medical registrar, focusing on two of the Capabilities in Practice (CiPs) from the Internal Medicine Stage 1 Curriculum:
- Managing an acute unselected take
- Managing a multi-disciplinary team including effective discharge planning
This discussion will be prompted by a short question provided by interviewers. This will not be given to you before - this will be given verbally by interviewers once the previous question is finished. This question will last approximately 7.5 minutes.
Questioning will ask you to draw on your experience of managing a team caring for acute medical admissions by giving examples of how you have managed that type of situation.
This question will explore ethical, professionalism and governance issues. It will start with a hypothetical situation which is not given to you before entering the station and will be given verbally by interviewers.
This is not a clinical question, but will deal with the moral, ethical, legal, etc. issues of a particular situation. Following the hypothetical situation, and where time allows, there will be one or more questions about GMC Good Medical Practice principles.
The assessment of this question is underpinned by the principles of GMC Good Medical Practice.
This question will last approximately 7.5 minutes.
Scoring framework
The score of 1-5 an interviewer will award you for each assessment area is judged in relation to how well you perform against an expected level. Below is the framework used to award scores at interview, as well as interpretation of what these scores represent:
Mark
|
Rating
|
Assessment
|
1 |
poor |
not considered appointable |
2 |
area for concern |
performed below the level expected from a core level trainee applying to the specialty; |
3 |
satisfactory |
performed at the level expected of a core level trainee applying to the specialty; |
4 |
good |
above average ability; |
5 |
excellent |
highly performing trainee; |
As shown in the table, for each of the question areas at interview, 3/5 is considered a satisfactory score; and reflects the level of performance that would be expected of a trainee ready to progress to a specialty training programme.
Should your performance go above and beyond this expected level, interviewers can award marks of 4/5 or 5/5 as appropriate.
Conversely, should your interview performance not reach the expected level, then interviewers can award marks of 1/5 or 2/5, as reflects their level of concern over your performance.
Appointability
Raw interview score (RIS)
The RIS is the sum of all ten scores awarded to you during your interview, but before any weighting is applied.
As each individual score will be between 1 and 5, your RIS will be between 10 and 50.
Appointability requirements
To be classed as 'appointable', you must meet all three criteria below:
- none of your ten interview scores can be 1/5
- no more than two of your ten interview scores can be 2/5
- your RIS must be 30 or above.
If you meet all three requirements, your application will be assessed as appointable, and can progress to be considered for post offers.
However, if you fail to meet any of these requirements, your application must then be assessed as not appointable, and it will progress no further in that round.
Total score
After interview, a weighting is applied to the scores in each area, as well as your application score.
These scores are then combined to give your total score which determines your ranking, which will in turn be used to inform how offers are made. The weighting of different sections, as well as the method by which your total score is established, is detailed in the table accessible through the link below:
|
Interviewer 1
|
Interviewer 2
|
Weighting
|
Max score
|
Question 1 |
||||
Application and Training |
/ 5 |
/ 5 |
1.5 |
15 |
Suitability & commitment |
/ 5 |
/ 5 |
1.0 |
10 |
Question 2 |
||||
Presentation |
/ 5 | / 5 | 1.5 | 15 |
Question 3 |
||||
Medical registrar suitability |
/ 5 |
/ 5 |
2.0 |
20 |
Question 4 |
|
|||
Professionalism & governance |
/ 5 |
/ 5 |
2.0 |
20 |
Raw interview score |
/ 50 |
|||
Interview score (w weighting) |
/ 80 |
|||
Application score |
/ 40 |
0.5 |
/ 20 |
|
Total score |
/ 100 |
|||
|
|